Effective diversification.....appropriate asset
allocation.....proper fund selections. These are some of the basic objectives
that every investor desire in a mutual fund portfolio. Irrespective of the investor’s
stage (whether in asset accumulation stage or in asset withdrawal) these goals
are essential for successful mutual fund portfolios. However, an investor can meet
many pitfalls or roadblocks in their quest to achieve these goals. The article explores
three of the most common impediments and offers suggestions on how to avoid
them.
Familiar
Mistake 1: Lack of Investment Strategy
This is perhaps the most common mistake
in mutual fund investment. I am always surprised by the huge number of investors
who select specific mutual funds devoid of giving any thought to an asset
allocation plan. Many individuals may actually identify and define their
investment goals, but then skip the next crucial step in setting up a
successful mutual fund portfolio: crafting a detailed
asset allocation Plan. With no suitable asset
allocation plan that accurately echoes individual investment preference and objectives
(return objectives, time horizon, risk tolerance, etc), the process of
selecting mutual funds will haphazard instead of logical.
Pending very few exceptions, the result
of haphazard mutual fund selection is improper asset allocation, which in turn leads to ineffective portfolio
diversification -- with the end
result being poor portfolio performance. True to the old men’s words, “Failure
to plan is planning to fail.”
On the other hand, effective
portfolio diversification is a direct result of an appropriate
and detailed asset allocation plan that fits individual investment goals and
preferences. Effective diversification spreads the assets among different mutual
fund categories to attain both a variety of distinct reward/risk objectives and a decrease in overall
risk. Appropriate asset allocation not only eradicates
undesirable characteristics of under-weighting, over-weighting and
inappropriate mutual funds, it accurately matches fund type and their
percentage of investment assets to specified goals – simply put, it is the
"blueprint" for effective fund selection.
Setting up a successful fund portfolio
is a three-step process:
1. Identifying your investment
objectives, goals and preferences, e.g. return objectives, portfolio amount, risk
tolerance and time horizon;
2. Formulating a comprehensive
asset allocation strategy by fund category to reflect preferred objectives;
3. Appropriate fund
selection to match each category.
The second step is the most difficult
due to the plenty of asset allocation strategies and theories. Most investment asset
allocation strategies fall into two main categories: one mainly treats risk as
a bond/stock allocation, with risk tolerance varying the percentage of bond and
stock funds; the other is basically a fund category allocation, with risk acceptance
dictating the type of fund groups and their allocation quotas within a basic bond/stock
allocation.
Regardless of the asset allocation
method you prefer as an investor, the important message is clear: avoid, at all
costs, the danger of haphazard fund selection, produce a detailed asset
allocation plan which precisely represents your investment goals and
preferences.
Familiar
mistake 2: Over-Weighting in High-Risk funds,
This is a specific example of portfolio
imbalance where a very large quota of your total investment assets are
concentrated in funds with very high reward/risk characteristics, even though
the fund categories may actually echo chosen portfolio objectives. The end
result is too much volatility in the price movement of these funds which can cause
disappointing investment performance because huge percentage of risk does not
justify the impending reward. Over-weighting can happen with any type of risk acceptance,
although over-weighting in high risk funds is more likely to be a problem.
High-risk stock fund categories include
emerging markets, small-cap growth (both domestic and foreign) and sector
funds; in bond categories, emerging market and some high-yield funds are also
high risk. These fund categories can be suitable in many portfolios, so long as an investor sticks to the principles of
effective diversification.
Is there a tolerable percentage of
high-risk funds to own in an investment portfolio? Most strategists suggest
between 5-30% of total investment assets, depending on the choices of
conservative, moderate or aggressive risk tolerances and growth, income-oriented return or
balance objectives. The key is to treat high risk mutual funds as an apposite
portfolio supplement without significantly increasing your overall risk.
Familiar
Mistake 3: Duplicating of Fund Categories
This is an example of inefficient
diversification and arises when an investor has two (or more) mutual funds with
similar objectives. For example, owning two large-cap growth funds, two
small-cap growth funds, and one intermediate corporate bond in a five-fund
investment portfolio is inefficient diversification due to the replication of
fund objectives in the large and small-cap growth types; in this strategy they
lack the diversity of distinct reward/risk characteristics of idyllic diversification. To evade duplication, it is good to
represent a fund category in your portfolio with just one fund.
The fundamental common factor in keeping
away from these three common mistakes is appropriate
comprehensive asset allocation: it provides effectual diversification
and eradicates the problems allied to haphazard fund selection -- it is the key
in setting up a successful fund portfolio.
No comments:
Post a Comment